---

All the problems in forex short-term trading,
Have answers here!
All the troubles in forex long-term investment,
Have echoes here!
All the psychological doubts in forex investment,
Have empathy here!

---



In the realm of two-way trading within the foreign exchange market, traders must deeply grasp a core concept: the so-called "Four-Price Strategy" is, in essence, a short-term trading technique.

---

Viewed through the lens of long-term market dynamics and statistical outcomes, short-term trading rarely yields consistent profits; conversely, it is long-term investing that truly offers an impregnable position.
This strategy is adopted by certain traders because its underlying logic appears simple and seems to align with the superficial patterns of price fluctuation. The "Four Prices" in question specifically refer to yesterday's low, yesterday's high, yesterday's close, and today's open.
The operational logic of this strategy is as follows: when the price is trading above the moving average—and the moving average exhibits a bullish alignment—a long position is opened if the price breaks above yesterday's high. Conversely, when the price is trading below the moving average—and the moving average exhibits a bearish alignment—a short position is opened if the price breaks below yesterday's low.
Regarding risk management and position closure, this strategy uniformly designates today's opening price as the stop-loss level and mandates that all positions be closed five minutes prior to the daily market close.
Although this approach may yield a win rate hovering around 50% in the short term, a long-term statistical analysis reveals that frequent short-term speculation inevitably leads to losses due to friction costs and probabilistic disadvantages. In contrast, long-term investing remains the true path to capturing major market trends and achieving capital appreciation.
Therefore, one should view short-term trading merely as a "market game," shifting one's primary focus instead to long-term value investing. Whenever circumstances permit, one should endeavor to avoid engaging in short-term trading altogether.

In the field of two-way trading within the foreign exchange market, the foundational realization that every mature trader must establish is this: trading techniques constitute merely an entry-level, fundamental component.

---

In essence, technical analysis serves as an auxiliary tool; the decisive role it plays within the overall profit-generation chain is extremely limited. Many traders who are new to the market often revere technical analysis as an infallible dogma—a perception that, in itself, requires immediate correction.
The most common pitfall encountered during the initial stages of foreign exchange trading manifests primarily as a systemic misalignment in one's approach to learning. In the early stages of trading, individuals are typically keen to delve into various technical indicators and analytical methods, devoting immense energy to the search for a so-called "Holy Grail" of trading—a strategy with an exceptionally high win rate—in the hope of cracking the market's code through a specific entry formula. However, technical proficiency alone cannot fundamentally resolve the issue of win rates; this is because the probability of price appreciation or depreciation in the forex market is, by its very nature, a 50/50 proposition. No entry method exists that can consistently generate a win rate deviating significantly from this equilibrium. More critically, a marginal probabilistic advantage—however slight—holds no significance in the context of a single trade. Even a mere 1% probability of error, if encountered at a specific, critical juncture, translates into a 100% loss for the trading account. This asymmetrical risk profile dictates that traders cannot pin their hopes solely on technical-level probabilistic advantages.
Regarding the true determinants of a trading strategy's win rate, *holding duration* is a variable that is frequently and severely underestimated. When the holding period is relatively short, market noise has not yet fully materialized, and the inherent randomness of price fluctuations remains comparatively low; consequently, the observed win rate tends to be higher. Conversely, as the holding duration extends, a position showing a floating profit is constantly at risk of reversing into a floating loss; an initially advantageous position may lose its edge amidst trend retracements or periods of market consolidation, causing the win rate to decline accordingly. Furthermore, differences in the specific *type* of forex trading strategy employed can also significantly impact win rate performance. Consider, for instance, the application of a "breakout" strategy: when applied to short-term trading, the win rate is often higher because short-term breakouts primarily capture the initial phase of momentum release. In contrast, when trend traders employ a similar logic, their win rate typically tends to be lower, as retracements and false breakouts within a sustained trend frequently trigger stop-loss orders. It must be emphasized, however, that regardless of the trading timeframe or stylistic approach adopted, the underlying probability of any single trade remains fundamentally 50/50; technical methods can only exert a marginal influence in a statistical sense and cannot alter this intrinsic characteristic.
So, how exactly should technical analysis be positioned within the context of forex trading? In short-term trading scenarios, the core value of technical analysis lies in addressing the critical issues of *entry timing* and *price point selection*. Traders can utilize moving average systems to identify the prevailing trend direction, leverage support and resistance levels to pinpoint potential reversal zones, or employ chart pattern breakouts to confirm specific entry signals. These tools empower traders to establish positions at relatively favorable price levels, thereby optimizing their risk-to-reward ratio. However, it is crucial to recognize—with absolute clarity—that technical proficiency alone cannot determine whether one ultimately achieves profitability. The market abounds with instances where traders correctly predicted the direction of a move yet failed to secure a profit. Precise entry timing is merely a *necessary* condition for profitability, not a *sufficient* one; rather, position sizing, risk management, psychological discipline, and exit strategies collectively constitute the actual pathway to realizing profits.
The concept of an FX trader "clearing the technical hurdle" does not imply reaching the pinnacle of technical mastery; rather, its true significance lies in completely shedding one's illusory over-reliance on trading techniques. It signifies a process of "demythologization" at the cognitive level: no longer believing that a specific technical indicator or analytical framework can guarantee consistent, above-market returns, and no longer viewing trend-following simply as a means to boost one's win rate. In reality, from a probabilistic standpoint, there is no fundamental difference between trading with the trend and trading against it. The deeper objective of trend-following is not to chase a higher win rate, but rather to align oneself with the flow of major market capital, thereby securing a relative advantage in terms of risk-reward ratios and the psychological composure required to hold positions. Only when a trader can calmly view technical analysis as merely one tool among many—without burdening it with expectations that exceed its inherent capabilities—can they be said to have truly cleared the technical hurdle, thereby paving the way for advancement toward higher-order trading cognition.

In the realm of two-way FX trading, participants may appear to be engaging in identical activities, yet the underlying logic driving their actions differs vastly. The core distinction lies here: a genuine FX trader is, in essence, *managing risk*; whereas a gambler is, in essence, *consuming thrills*.

---

Many people mistakenly believe that the fundamental difference between a trader and a gambler lies in whether or not they possess technical analysis skills. However, this is not the essential distinction. The true difference manifests in the *dimension of thought* applied *before* executing a trade. Before placing an order, a trader will prudently evaluate whether the underlying logic of the trade holds water, assess the magnitude of potential risks, and formulate a specific exit strategy in the event that their initial judgment proves incorrect. Their decisions are grounded in rational analysis and meticulous planning. Conversely, before placing an order, a gambler’s thoughts revolve around questions such as: "Can I make a killing on this move?" "Can I quickly recoup my losses?" or "Should I give in to impulse just one more time?" Their behavior is driven primarily by emotions—specifically, greed and a craving for excitement.
Although, on the surface, both individuals may be analyzing candlestick charts, their underlying behavioral patterns are diametrically opposed. A trader patiently waits for the objective conditions—those that align with their specific trading system—to fully materialize; consequently, they are able to remain calm and composed while holding a cash position, waiting for the opportune moment. A gambler, conversely, waits for moments of emotional impulse; driven by an insatiable urge to act, they constantly engage in frequent, unnecessary trades.
When market movements run counter to expectations, the reactions of the two groups diverge even more sharply. A trader respects the market; the moment a pre-set stop-loss point is triggered, they decisively admit their error and exit the position, thereby keeping their losses confined within an acceptable range. A gambler, however, typically refuses to acknowledge their mistakes, choosing instead to stubbornly "ride out" their losses in the hope that the market will miraculously reverse—a strategy that often leads to catastrophic consequences.
Regarding profits, their mindsets are equally disparate. Traders view profits as the realization of a properly functioning trading system and the successful execution of a strategy—an outcome that is entirely expected. They prioritize the consistency of their system over the specific gains or losses of any single trade. Gamblers, on the other hand, attribute their profits to their own brilliance and prowess, viewing them as validation of their personal abilities; this only serves to further fuel their blind overconfidence and risk-seeking tendencies.
In reality, many individuals do not lack the capacity for market analysis. Yet, the moment they actually place an order, their behavior ceases to be governed by their established trading system; instead, it becomes driven by dopamine-fueled emotional fluctuations. Consequently, the fundamental dividing line between a forex trader and a gambler is never merely the level of their technical analysis skills, but rather their underlying motivation: Are you earnestly cultivating a long-term career, or are you simply using the market to satisfy short-term emotional cravings? The former seeks sustainable, steady growth; the latter seeks fleeting thrills and excitement. Recognizing this distinction is the first step toward becoming a mature trader.

In the two-way trading environment of the forex market, there often exists a seemingly contradictory yet universal rule: the market consistently rewards ordinary traders who maintain a steady approach and do not seek hasty success, while frequently placing formidable obstacles in the path of those who are overconfident and eager to prove themselves.

---

Many individuals venturing into forex trading initially fall into a cognitive trap, believing that the core of trading is a contest of intellect—an intense study of market patterns, a meticulous refinement of trading strategies, and a ceaseless polishing of execution techniques. They act as if being sufficiently intelligent and working hard enough will guarantee consistent profitability in the market.
However, as trading experience accumulates, most traders gradually come to realize that the forex market never rewards so-called "smart people." Those who rely excessively on their intellect and seek immediate results are often the ones most likely to lose their bearings amidst market volatility and suffer losses. The individuals who truly manage to gain a firm foothold in the forex market—achieving steady, long-term profitability—are typically those possessing specific personality traits. These traits serve as the critical criteria for selecting qualified traders during simulated trading assessments, and, more importantly, act as the defining markers distinguishing short-term speculators from long-term profit-makers.
The first key personality trait is patience—arguably the most fundamental and indispensable quality in forex trading. For novices, the fear of "missing out" (FOMO) and the tendency to blindly chase trends are almost the norm. The slightest market fluctuation can cause them to be swept up by collective market sentiment; thoughts constantly race through their minds: "I can't let this rally pass me by," "If I don't jump in now, I'll miss a profit opportunity," or "Everyone else is making money—I can't afford to fall behind." Driven by such emotions, they often rush into trades—sometimes even blindly increasing their position sizes—while completely disregarding the inherent uncertainty of market volatility. Ultimately, due to a loss of emotional equilibrium and an inability to withstand the ensuing losses, they are forced to exit the market under duress—an outcome that not only depletes their account capital but also severely undermines their trading confidence. During simulated trading assessments, those traders who successfully pass the evaluation and endure the process rarely exhibit such impatience. They are able to calmly accept missing out on certain market movements because they deeply understand that the forex market is a perpetual entity—one that never lacks trading opportunities. Conversely, the capital in a trading account is finite and cannot withstand the depletion caused by repeated, blind operations. One of the core purposes of these simulated assessments is to help traders cultivate this patience—to learn how to remain composed amidst market volatility, waiting for the entry points with the highest probability of success, rather than blindly chasing every single fluctuation.
The second core personality trait is humility; this is the key for traders to maintain reverence for the market and avoid catastrophic risks. In forex trading, many traders fall into a common trap: after a series of successful trades yielding a certain level of profit, they develop an inflated sense of self-importance. They begin to believe they have fully mastered market dynamics and can accurately predict every price movement, subsequently lowering their guard and blindly scaling up their trading volume. Conversely, when a series of trades fail to meet expectations and result in losses, they become desperate to recoup those losses by aggressively increasing their position size—thereby spiraling into a vicious cycle where "the more they try to recover, the more they lose."
In reality, this is not a flaw in their trading methodology; rather, the core issue lies in the traders beginning to overestimate their own cognitive capabilities. They forget the inherent complexity and uncertainty of the forex market, losing their sense of reverence for its power. Truly mature forex traders consistently acknowledge the limits of their own understanding; they clearly recognize that they cannot control every market fluctuation, nor can they accurately predict every market trend. Instead, they focus exclusively on trading opportunities they fully comprehend—those accompanied by clear signals and a high degree of confidence. For market conditions that appear ambiguous or fall outside the scope of their expertise, they resolutely choose to remain on the sidelines rather than participating blindly.
Just as in the simulated assessments, traders who maintain a humble mindset do not become complacent after a few successful trades, nor do they become reckless and impulsive after a few losses. They consistently maintain a balanced temperament—neither arrogant nor impatient—treating every single trade with seriousness and meticulously analyzing every mistake. In doing so, they effectively avoid the critical errors that could otherwise lead to catastrophic losses in their trading accounts. What they truly fear is never the missed opportunity for a specific profit, but rather the irreversible damage inflicted upon their capital as a result of blind, undisciplined trading. The third core personality trait is composure—the cornerstone enabling traders to overcome emotional interference and engage in rational trading. The dynamics of the forex market are in a constant state of flux; a series of trades failing to meet expectations does not guarantee that the next trade will be profitable—rather, it may signal that the market trend has yet to become clear. Conversely, a period of favorable market movement does not guarantee a sustained rally, as a reversal could occur at any moment.
However, in actual trading, emotions often cloud a trader's judgment. Many traders, after incurring losses, fall into a pattern of impulsive, spiteful trading—attempting to recoup their losses through desperate, all-or-nothing gambles. When the market undergoes a minor reversal, they may blindly bet on a sustained trend shift, disregarding the inherent randomness of market fluctuations. Others rely excessively on past trading experiences, using historical price movements in isolation to predict future market conditions while ignoring changes in the broader market environment. These represent typical examples of irrational trading mindsets and constitute major causes of financial loss.
In reality, forex trading is fundamentally a game of probabilities; every trade carries the potential for both profit and loss. The core objective of trading is not to achieve a profit on every single trade, but rather to employ rational strategies to maximize the probability of profit while minimizing the magnitude of losses. Trading should never serve as an outlet for emotional release; instead, it is a protracted battle demanding calm judgment and rational decision-making. Simulated trading environments serve as the ideal training ground for traders to cultivate a composed mindset and eliminate emotional interference. Within these simulations—free from the pressure of risking actual capital—traders can confront various market fluctuations, practice emotional self-regulation, and learn to avoid greed during profitable periods and impatience during losses, thereby gradually cultivating habits of rational analysis and calm decision-making.
On the journey of forex trading, every step of personal growth and every accumulation of profit essentially represents the realization of one's inherent character strengths. Conversely, every failed trade and every account loss is often the price paid for succumbing to negative emotions such as impulsiveness, greed, or a refusal to accept defeat. The forex market will never alter its fundamental laws of operation for anyone, nor will its fluctuating trends show the slightest sympathy toward any individual trader. Instead, it operates strictly according to its own internal logic, ultimately filtering out all but those traders who truly possess a steadfast mindset and exceptional character traits. Those who truly go the distance in the world of forex trading—achieving consistent, long-term profitability—are never the ones with the highest IQs or the sharpest intellects. Rather, they are the ones with the most stable mindsets and personalities best aligned with the fundamental nature of trading. Whether in the heat of live trading or during the rigorous trials of simulated evaluations, success in forex trading ultimately hinges not on the accuracy of a single judgment, nor on the profit generated by a solitary trade, but on a character etched into one's very bones—the composure and steadfastness displayed in the face of market volatility, and the unwavering patience, humility, and calmness maintained throughout the journey.

In the realm of forex investment—specifically in its two-way trading environment—large-capital, long-term position holders often find themselves in a rather delicate predicament.

---

Carry-trade investors—those who routinely hold positions for years, or even for periods exceeding five years—are typically unwelcome guests among forex brokers within the industry. This lack of welcome stems not from any inherent flaw in the trading activity itself, but rather from the profound challenge their specific holding patterns pose to the brokers' underlying business models.
From a broker's perspective, long-term carry trades—particularly those involving currency pairs with extreme interest rate differentials, such as the Turkish Lira against the Japanese Yen or the Hungarian Forint against the Japanese Yen—are often branded with a distinctly negative label within the industry: "toxic flow." There is a clear commercial logic underpinning this designation: when traders maintain such positions over extended periods, the broker is compelled to pay them substantial overnight interest (rollover) day after day. This interest does not materialize out of thin air; the broker must ultimately enter the interbank market to hedge these positions and pass the corresponding costs downstream. The critical issue arises when the interest rate differential reaches a certain magnitude, and the trader exhibits a "buy-and-hold" mentality—entering positions but never exiting them, effectively locking up capital for the long haul. Under such circumstances, the broker faces immense pressure regarding liquidity coverage. In extreme scenarios, they may even encounter the precarious situation of an "inverted spread"—where the cost incurred by the broker to source liquidity from the market exceeds the overnight interest they are paying out to their clients. Such an inversion is, for any business model, fundamentally unsustainable.
Even when a broker operates on a "pure pass-through" model—routing client orders directly to the interbank market—large-capital, long-term carry trades frequently still face rejection or exclusion by the upstream liquidity providers. When a trading position reaches a certain magnitude and consistently generates stable profits, the banks providing the price quotes quickly realize that this position cannot be absorbed—or "washed out"—through normal market fluctuations. As central participants in the market, banks inherently do not welcome such a long-term counterparty relationship where the client is guaranteed to profit; after all, the certainty of your profits implies a corresponding certainty in the bank's risk exposure. Faced with this situation, banks typically exert pressure on the brokerage firm, demanding either that spreads be widened for such clients to compensate for the risk, that the clients' overnight interest earnings be directly reduced, or even that implicit barriers be imposed regarding the provision of liquidity.
For brokerage firms operating under a "dealing desk" (or counter-betting) model, a trader engaged in carry trades—whose equity curve rises almost in a straight line over the course of several years—poses a fundamental threat. The logical foundation upon which these dealing-desk platforms survive is the Law of Large Numbers: they aim to naturally hedge their risk by offsetting the gains and losses of a large volume of retail traders, thereby earning stable revenue through spreads and commissions. However, when a single account demonstrates a pattern of 100% consistent profitability—spanning a period as long as five years—this specific profit trajectory completely shatters the platform's risk model. The platform is unable to offset this guaranteed profit payout using the losses incurred by other clients, nor can it dilute its risk exposure through general market volatility. Under these circumstances, dealing-desk brokers often opt for a strategy of "cold-shouldering": they gradually marginalize these "nightmare-level" clients—by restricting leverage, adjusting price quotes, creating obstacles for deposits and withdrawals, or simply encouraging them to close their accounts—in order to preserve the very operational logic upon which their own survival depends.

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---